Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I wish more generalists did more of this (summarizing/referencing these debates instead of just one angle). As a high school teacher, it’s often tough just to read one book on a topic, let alone multiple. Do you have any other tips on surveying the state of debate on a topic?
Some fields produce 'companion' volumes which - at least in theory - should be 'state of the debate' ('status quaestionis') treatments. These are common in classics but rarer elsewhere. Some fields also produce 'questions in...' readers/volumes which are much the same...
...but more explicitly intended as teaching tools. Unfortunately, the academics writing chapters in those volumes often use them as an opportunity to drive their side of the debate. Honestly, I'm not sure of a reliable shortcut other than "ask a specialist in person."
Thanks! That makes plenty of sense. With most subjects, I think I mostly want to know if I’m accidentally teaching something hopelessly out of date, or if there’s something crucial I’m unaware of. It’s also good for students to know that historical knowledge is far from static.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
