Perfectly happy to have a 'shape of the field' chat with you, if you want to examine it further.
I think your idea of what the field of military history looks like, beyond the pop-books about the ACW, may be a bit outdated. Drum-and-Trumpet history like that hasn't really been the core of the field for 40+ years now, even if it sells at battlefield parks.
-
-
-
I'd listen to that podcast episode.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
The issue is that mil-historians are generally trying to explain outcomes. We'll give accounts of battles and campaigns, but the tendency is to see the role of organization, technology or social context as more determinative of outcomes (who wins/achieves objectives).
- Näytä vastaukset
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.