Meanwhile, business-style management imposes all new administrative overhead as admin. functions are moved out of the faculty departments and into big centralized administrations that look more like companies. The thing is, there's no effective cost control...17/xx
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
...because the Pale Horse of the Business Model is federally subsidized student debt. 18-year-olds are not great at calculating long-term cost-benefit; offer them a fun time now for money paid in the future and most will take it. So more admin, more amenities, more debt. 18/xx
11 vastausta 109 uudelleentwiittausta 1 134 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
To be clear, basically none of this massive increase in tuition - and it is *massive* - goes to professors. Let me repeat that: BASICALLY NONE OF THIS MONEY GOES TO ANYONE WHO TEACHES. (rip your ears, I know). 19/xx
14 vastausta 451 uudelleentwiittausta 3 062 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Instead - it's hard to get good data - but instructor pay has probably gone *down* over the same period. Not because professor pay has been cut, but because the teachers have been adjunctified under the business-model imperative to cut costs. 20/xx
4 vastausta 102 uudelleentwiittausta 1 445 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
75% - SEVENTY FIVE PERCENT - of university instructors are non-tenure track and more than half - *more*than*half* are adjuncts! (https://www.newfacultymajority.info/facts-about-adjuncts/ …). So the average *teacher* - not professor because most aren't anymore - gets paid LESS. 21/xx
15 vastausta 232 uudelleentwiittausta 1 683 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Now you might ask - why the Business Model of Education? Well the answer is it goes back to our first horseman - legislatures looking to cut back on universities demanded this model as a way to cut costs and have continued to demand it even after the economy improved. 22/xx
1 vastaus 47 uudelleentwiittausta 785 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Here's the thing: it's all a false economy. No, not that the economy is fake - it's fake savings. Like when you overbuy at the grocery store because everything is on sale - you haven't 'saved' anything - you've spent more. It's that kind of false economy. 23/xx
3 vastausta 81 uudelleentwiittausta 1 142 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Not only does the amenities-admin-tuition inflation turn into a treadmill going nowhere, but adjunctification is just as bad for the core mission of the university. Because you are burning these adjuncts out at a fearful rate; overloaded and underpaid...24/xx
2 vastausta 72 uudelleentwiittausta 1 012 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
They often can't teach as intensively as TT faculty and they don't stay in the job long enough to get excellent at it. Teachers get better over time - so burning them out wastes experience. The result is inferior teaching, even though most adjuncts work hard! 25/-continues-
15 vastausta 71 uudelleentwiittausta 992 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Smart thread, Bret, than a disastrous crash. Most of the best, most dedicated instructors are adjuncts. That’s just statistics. And that’s my experience in 30 years of higher ed.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä
Please note the addendum at the end of the thread!
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @mike_sell
Twitter is not great for nuance. I too know many great adjunct instructors. I also know that many of them think they could deliver much better if they were less overworked and less underpaid.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.