Sure, but what I mean is you're pointing to grant money replacing state money at an absolute funding level. But if enrollments had to be larger for that to happen, then that static pool of inflation adjusted money has to support more costs (read: students)?
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Curious - what do you think of my potential set of solutions then? At the end of the thread - do you think doing that would put the universities on better footing, post-COVID? Because it seems pretty clear that even pre-COVID, there were real problems in the system re: tuition.
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
I may need you to unpack that. Do you mean "adjunctification is not bad" or "adjunctification will go away on its own"?
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Well that's good. It sure as hell doesn't *feel* like it - and I wonder how of that is PhDs flowing into admin jobs. But then that's the space I'm stuck in right now - job market froze up on me due to COVID so I'm in a holding pattern - so that might effect my impression.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Although, looking at that data, I wonder how much that also reflects the emergence of two-tier departments with teaching-track and research-track 'full time' professors.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.