-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
I cite the source for my figures in the thread. I'm open to the idea that this looks different depending on how you cut the data. But if the situation we're in is "we have recession, funding almost-but-doesn't-quite recover, before collapsing again" I'm not sure that's better?
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
But the same time, that rush of student grant funding is split itself over more students - my impression is that enrollments in 2010-2011 were higher than '06-'08. So to get that grant money you have to stretch it over more students, which further strains instructional?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Sure, but what I mean is you're pointing to grant money replacing state money at an absolute funding level. But if enrollments had to be larger for that to happen, then that static pool of inflation adjusted money has to support more costs (read: students)?
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
Curious - what do you think of my potential set of solutions then? At the end of the thread - do you think doing that would put the universities on better footing, post-COVID? Because it seems pretty clear that even pre-COVID, there were real problems in the system re: tuition.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.