Which then finally brings us to our last horseman, Pestilence. Because if you are running one of these universities, you have massive problems - you can't simply say "we'll do the courses online and charge full freight"...27/x
-
-
(Teaching track faculty are typically non-tenure-track faculty with heavier teaching loads and less research expectations. It's mostly a form of permanent academic serfdom, but in my experience, teaching-track faculty tend to value education and students the most). 38/41
Näytä tämä ketju -
Step 3: Using the first two steps as conditions, *cap*tuition.* And I mean *all*in* tuition - fees, everything. Index the cap to the average of inflation and teacher pay (counted as an average per-credit-hour so it reflects adjunct pay, not just TT pay). 39/41
Näytä tämä ketju -
That way, if universities want to raise tuition, they need to be reinvesting that money into smaller classes, more instructors and more instructional resources. And honestly, legislatures should demand the superior teaching that comes from TT-faculty...40/41
Näytä tämä ketju -
...who have the time to truly perfect the craft of teaching. That way the next time we have to go online for a pandemic (it will happen again!) students will know they are still getting the thing they paid for: an education. end/41
Näytä tämä ketju -
Addendum on 'the business model' of education - this article at Inside Higher Ed. from 2009 does a good job of explaining it. Back then, it was the up-and-coming model. It is now standard at almost all major state schools, even though it doesn't work.https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2009/02/16/business-model-wrong-model …
Näytä tämä ketju -
Addendum 2: Some folks are pointing out that adjunctification here is a little lopsided and incomplete. And they're right! There just wasn't space in an already overlong thread. Being an adjunct myself, you can bet I have thoughts! But that will have to wait for another thread.
Näytä tämä ketju -
FYI - I've continued this thread here: https://twitter.com/BretDevereaux/status/1297679530744852481 … talking about university staff vs. administration, what we mean when we say 'bloat' and what we might do about it.
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Probably also a good idea to cut back on advancement positions as well. Manage the endowment but stop chasing donations that create more unfunded liabilities to match donor demands.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
This is one place where I disagree. The skill sets involved in being a good teacher or researcher are almost entirely different than those of being a good administrator. Let’s not waste 10+ years of ed & 6+ years of learning the job to get tenure by getting academics to be admins
-
Ditto to different skillsets. Admissions and student affairs professionals are *professionals* and we have very particular competencies. Faculty won't be recruiting at college fairs or sitting with the student having an emotional meltdown - that's our job.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.