This week on the blog, we're starting our dive into the basic structures of premodern farming, beginning with a look at common patterns of smaller subsistence farmers. How did these families work to manage the inherent risks of subsistence farming?https://acoup.blog/2020/07/24/collections-bread-how-did-they-make-it-part-i-farmers/ …
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Can't wait for the rest of the series! One thing I don't really understand: you said money wasn't a viable way of mitigating risk in part because the problems that farmers were trying to mitigate would increase the price of grain in the years when they needed to buy it the most.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @johfst ja @BretDevereaux
But you also said that one of the reasons for keeping strong social ties was that times of crisis would usually only hit your house, not your neighbors. How do we reconcile these two facts?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @johfst
It's a bit more complex than this. In times of scarcity, the farmers are going to be actively withholding their meager harvests from the markets (and probably hiding them from the tax man), in which case, your sister's husband or neighbor may be a better source of food.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
But you are also preparing for different kinds of crises. Some hit the whole village, some hit individual households. For whole-village crises, you are also cultivating vertical ties, which is next week's topic.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.