Hi academia. Just in case it's unclear, if a reviewer ever writes something like this, they are a gatekeeping asshole, and all you should take away is that they are a terrible person and the editor needed to do better.https://twitter.com/JoshCCall/status/1285252162516385799 …
My first response is "why was this review process not double-blind?" The editor may need to see your name, but Reviewer 2 does not. All of my experiences of peer review (admittedly, not many) have been double blind. Is this not standard?
-
-
Not sure. Book proposal?
-
That would make sense. Still garbage response, of course. Who the hell thinks that only people they know might be positioned to talk about a topic?
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.