And if I may add: because the thing you are paying for is supposed to be the education not the 'experience.' The experience is just packaging Asking why pay for online courses is like asking if you have to pay for fruit in the grocery , even if they aren't individually wrappedhttps://twitter.com/tlecaque/status/1283824742164824065 …
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
what good is expert access as an undergrad? This is just a more nerdy ideal of the "college experience" sales pitch. College now is about paying for credentials. Nobody is going to put themselves in debt for "access" and my online courses had tests made by the textbook makers.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @TilerKiwi
Those are poor online courses, but I hesitate to blame the instructors; many online courses are done by underpaid and overworked adjuncts. I'm not sure what to say to the assumption that there is no value in mulling over big ideas and important theories with great minds.
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Put me in a room with Einstein, you're not going to get great ideas, you're going to have a world class expert and a dude trying to remember what a kilogram is. Assuming people just aren't appreciating the value, given the huge costs, seems, to me, a tad unfair. (cont in a bit)
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Ah, indeed! This is why we assign readings.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.