Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
what good is expert access as an undergrad? This is just a more nerdy ideal of the "college experience" sales pitch. College now is about paying for credentials. Nobody is going to put themselves in debt for "access" and my online courses had tests made by the textbook makers.
Those are poor online courses, but I hesitate to blame the instructors; many online courses are done by underpaid and overworked adjuncts. I'm not sure what to say to the assumption that there is no value in mulling over big ideas and important theories with great minds.
Speaking broadly from the Mediterranean educational tradition stretching back to the classical period, it seems to me to have long been understood that the best way to become learned and enjoy the benefits of that knowledge was to converse with the already-learned.
I think we often fall into the false assumption that knowledge-banks like wikipedia are new. They are not. The early Middle Ages saw an explosion of such works produced in Spain and Byzantium (in book, rather than web form). Isadore of Seville is most famous for this.
Put me in a room with Einstein, you're not going to get great ideas, you're going to have a world class expert and a dude trying to remember what a kilogram is. Assuming people just aren't appreciating the value, given the huge costs, seems, to me, a tad unfair. (cont in a bit)
Ah, indeed! This is why we assign readings.
Having been an underpaid, overworked adjunct, I can say our time & work is undervalued & we are treated as the Ed equivalent of migrant workers. Universities have adopted the cutthroat, exploitative attitudes of profit-seeking. Btwn that & credentialism, these are fair questions.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
