I don't think you should be throwing stones there - I don't really disagree with you on humanities value, but one thing that really did come across from the post is that you really don't understand stem thinking, although you do appreciate the products it gives.
My post on the value of the humanities seems to have brought out at least a few STEM commenters with the self-disproving argument that science-aptitude is the only form of intelligence - an argument you can only make if you lack all of the other forms.
-
-
-
But that's my point, isn't it? I am not a scientist or an engineer, but I am perfectly willing to concede that both have access to a form of knowledge that has value - and yet there are a great many of them who are not willing to concede the same in return.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
As a hardcore STEM person, I apologise. Personally feel that all subjects are heavily underfunded at the moment, the world is not suffering from an excess of intelligence.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
And honestly, 12 seconds contemplating Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg should dissuade you of that.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
They can’t help their independent variable complex. Cut them some slack.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Color me completely shocked that a group of people so omniscient wouldn't've already gleaned your position on STEMlords based on how you repeatedly described Saruman in your Helm's Deep post series as an archetypal arrogant STEMlord dummy-wummy
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.