-
look, capitalism is bad, so all things that are bad are capitalism.
Ho boy is there an exciting debate we can have with roughly 100 year historiography on the degree to which the Roman Empire could be fairly described as capitalist. But, ah, the short answer is "no, probably not."
-
-
Maybe I'm tugging on a thread you don't have the time or inclination to answer, but surely the Roman Empire was a capitalist market system: trade routes throughout the empire, patricians in lucrative private businesses, etc.
-
Although maybe you're saying that the primary motivation behind Roman policy decisions wasn't strengthening the capitalist economy, which makes sense and which I would agree with.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.