...that is power. Power arises out of legitimacy, it arises out of cultural norms, it arises out of reciprocity with authority. Foolish leaders mistake violence for a kind of power - this is Arendt's key point. They think more violence=more power... 7/16
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
...but that's wrong. Where you have power, you don't need violence. And where you use violence *you*don't*have*power.* The very *use* of violence erodes power, because it strikes at the legitimacy that power arises from. 8/16
3 vastausta 12 uudelleentwiittausta 68 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
The President routinely mistakes violence for power in this way. He is suggesting that he can use the military - which trades in violence, rather than power - to restore order. And sure, the military can clear the streets. It will be ugly, it will cause damage...9/16
1 vastaus 2 uudelleentwiittausta 30 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
...but they can do it. But the military cannot reestablish *power* - they cannot restore legitimacy. Negotiation can do that. Compromise can do that. Community leaders can do that. Elected officials standing together can do that. 10/16
2 vastausta 3 uudelleentwiittausta 36 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
A country can hold another country by force, if they have enough of it. That's what empire is. Clever empires convert that into power as quickly as possible - the Romans did it by co-opting local elites, using their legitimacy as the foundation of Roman power. 11/16
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 31 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
But no country can hold *itself* by force, or through violence for very long. Because the country is the base that generates the force. Even tyrants and dictators have to establish legitimacy and power; they put lots of effort into it. 12/16
2 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 29 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
And let's be clear, this isn't a two-Americas thing; there are protests in every state in the nation. The mask has been torn off the eyes of a lot of people who didn't know or didn't want to know what was done in their name and they are angry. That bell cannot be un-rung. 13/16
1 vastaus 3 uudelleentwiittausta 32 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Things may calm down for a moment. But unless the government reestablishes power - which you cannot do with tear-gar and batons - through legitimacy and legitimacy through **justice**, we're just going to be back here again, and sooner than you'd think... 14/16
1 vastaus 2 uudelleentwiittausta 39 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
So this isn't a moment for tough-talk and bravado. It's a moment for listening, compassion and negotiation. And unfortunately, I think we all know that is a kind of leadership that the president is both unable and unwilling to perform. 15/16
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 34 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
We're going to get to choose new leaders soon. Be looking out, locally and nationally - which of your representatives saw this as a moment to restore legitimacy and show leadership? Who saw this as an opportunity to wield violence? And choose accordingly. 16/16
4 vastausta 7 uudelleentwiittausta 46 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju
And to my representatives - @RepDavidEPrice , @ThomTillis , @SenatorBurr , @NC_Governor , @verlainsko , @FousheeforNC - I hope you are listening.
We're watching the kind of leadership you show.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.