...really disjointed biographies (esp. Plutarch) because while there *were* narrative sources for these important battles, they don't survive. And that's with a fairly complete reckoning of all of the material that made it out of the classical past.
...is pure invention, confused or just plain wrong. Events happen in the wrong reigns of emperors, crucial events are just skipped because Bede doesn't know they happened, and so on. Faramir, of course, is not Bede - but a Bede-like figure was probably his teacher.
-
-
So he may well have learned from a history wherein 'Isildur became king, but then went north and returned not. Then Meneldil became king and he did XYZ thing" The lacuna might not even be noted as such. Bede sure doesn't.
-
Much appreciation. Related question (and it may be that you've engaged with this in other settings); while Tolkien offers tremendous sense of the age of the Middle Earth, we don't necessarily get a sense of whether there were "ancients" in the way we think of them now.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.