...of Livy and Polybius are lost, and all we have are later summaries of their work. Often that means literally knowing, "An important battle at <place> happened in this year and <side> won." Sometimes we're left trying to sketch out the events of a decade from...
But if you want a sense of how bad the information environment can be - read the first few chapters of Bede's Ecclesiastical History (http://www.heroofcamelot.com/docs/Bede-Ecclesiastical-History.pdf …). He gets some things about Roman Britain mostly OK (Caesar, Claudius), but some of the rest...
-
-
...is pure invention, confused or just plain wrong. Events happen in the wrong reigns of emperors, crucial events are just skipped because Bede doesn't know they happened, and so on. Faramir, of course, is not Bede - but a Bede-like figure was probably his teacher.
-
So he may well have learned from a history wherein 'Isildur became king, but then went north and returned not. Then Meneldil became king and he did XYZ thing" The lacuna might not even be noted as such. Bede sure doesn't.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.