It strikes me also as a more improvised thing. The equipment isn't ideal for the role. Cf. the legion's velites integrated screening force, which not only used javelins, but used a different *type* of javelin from the heavy infantry; hasta velitaris seems to be much lighter.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @Roelkonijn ja
I think clearly you'd rather have peltasts in this role if you could, but Xen. has frighteningly few to work with in the Anabasis; 2,100 peltasts and 200 archers for a force of 10,700 hoplites, if my numbers are right. Cf. 1200 velites screening 3000 roman heavy inf.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @Roelkonijn ja
I think we all agree with that assumption - that the tactic is an emergency measure. You don’t do it if you have psiloi to do it for you.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MykeCole, @Roelkonijn ja
Sure, sure. I just think that probably argues against a system of drill for the tactic.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @Roelkonijn ja
I don’t see why? Why would you risk disrupting critical cohesion when a relatively low amount of prep would be necessary to mitigate that risk?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MykeCole, @Roelkonijn ja
Mostly because the Roman system for doing the same was kind of complex and purpose-built. Not only having the velites, but having a formation built with lanes for them to retreat through, and a command system with smaller tactical units.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @MykeCole ja
Of course I want to be cautious here - we're getting out beyond our sources to say much of anything at all. If you'll permit the jurassic park reference, we're mostly debating frog DNA here. But that's my read: this stuff is hard, the Romans needed a formation designed for it..
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @MykeCole ja
...Xen. doesn't have that - or honestly anything really approaching it in terms of tactical or command sophistication. So I think probably it was an undrilled ad hoc solution that worked OK in the event, but wasn't really meaningfully institutionalized, even at the time.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @Roelkonijn ja
That’s more of a leap than I’m comfortable with. There’s a strong practical argument for it, and the sources don’t clearly support either interpretation.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MykeCole, @Roelkonijn ja
I mean, it's all leaps, the question is direction. Faced with weak sources, do you assume relatively more sophistication or relatively less? That is perhaps the core debate running through ancient history - economic, legal, political, etc.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä
I guess that makes me an ancient-military-history primitivist (which is odd - I'm a pretty unabashed modernist on econ. and law.). But I tend to assume if we don't have evidence for some kind of tactical/organizational sophistication, that's because it didn't exist.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @Roelkonijn ja
I don’t know that that is a safe assumption when you have such a bad paucity of source material. The history of ancient warfare feels to me like one long string of lacunae.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MykeCole, @BretDevereaux ja
We do have some arguments from silence, weak as they are. Xenophon describes Spartan formation drill in 3 different works, but never gives a hint of drill for out-running. Given the limited time for training perioikoi, drill would have to be minimal. &c.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.