Yeah, I do believe it was a collateral duty. But to be selected for it implies some confidence - not just in age and fitness, but the ability to operate independently without impact to cohesion.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MykeCole, @Roelkonijn ja
I note the guys don't have a drill for running back to the lines. Couldn't they fall back on an officer-- "On me, lads") and retreat at the double, rather than madly trying to outrun the peltasts who are dashing on their unshielded side and unleashing broadsides of javelins ?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Nakhthor, @Roelkonijn ja
I wouldn’t bet on it. In my experience, with the helmet on and trying to keep one eye on incoming missiles, if you don’t have a plan, you’re going to step on everyone. And that’s in a non-lethal re-enactment with lower adrenaline. Maybe a countermarch where you return 1/2
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
2/2 rear rank and the epistates becomes the promachos after you take off running on a prearranged signal? Xenophon describes the countermarch, so we know that’s already a thing.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
I doubt we should picture the outrunning as a drill. It's just running after individual peltasts, and then turning and running back. The outrunners would probably have scattered, making orderly withdrawal impossible for sheer distance.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Roelkonijn, @Nakhthor ja
Why do you doubt it was a drill? Wouldn’t it make better sense to have some kind of plan in place for rapidity/fluidity of action? And we know from Xenophon that rudimentary and basic drill was already in place.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
By definition these guys would be working in irregular ground against a skittish cloud of assailants. How would you drill for that? It'd be like planning your dice rolls.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @Roelkonijn, @MykeCole ja
It strikes me also as a more improvised thing. The equipment isn't ideal for the role. Cf. the legion's velites integrated screening force, which not only used javelins, but used a different *type* of javelin from the heavy infantry; hasta velitaris seems to be much lighter.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @Roelkonijn ja
I think clearly you'd rather have peltasts in this role if you could, but Xen. has frighteningly few to work with in the Anabasis; 2,100 peltasts and 200 archers for a force of 10,700 hoplites, if my numbers are right. Cf. 1200 velites screening 3000 roman heavy inf.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @Roelkonijn ja
I think we all agree with that assumption - that the tactic is an emergency measure. You don’t do it if you have psiloi to do it for you.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä
Sure, sure. I just think that probably argues against a system of drill for the tactic.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux, @Roelkonijn ja
I don’t see why? Why would you risk disrupting critical cohesion when a relatively low amount of prep would be necessary to mitigate that risk?
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @MykeCole, @Roelkonijn ja
Mostly because the Roman system for doing the same was kind of complex and purpose-built. Not only having the velites, but having a formation built with lanes for them to retreat through, and a command system with smaller tactical units.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys - Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.