Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I loved your article, but I would make a difference: "hard times" do build harder men, that does not mean better soldiers. I would put anytime a well trained, well organized platoon of "soft" soldiers with logistic support against a warband of fearsome individualistic warriors.
The issue is that military performance is the metric by which the mirage makes value judgments, because the mirage emerges out of cultures (ancient and modern) which held military virtues as the highest and most important sort of virtues.
So the question becomes, if they can't find, in what sense are they really 'hard men' at all? Because they have bad clothes, poor diets and low literacy? The ancients considered those regrettable flaws, balanced only by military performance.
In the end, I don't think it is possible to assess the mirage outside of its claims to a military performance or military virtue advantage, because that is the central feature of it.
Ok. In this context I completely agree with you. To get an organized effective military training/equipment "good" times are fundamental. Efficient guerrilla can be created by "hard men" but it's effectiveness in classic military achievements/context is debatable at best.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
