Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
It should be seen as a partner to humanities – it provides real time correction on the rote aspects of the discipline, freeing teacher up to focus on the higher ideas/purposes of their fields.
I see systems like it as a tool - but one a student should to move past. The 'rote' aspects of the discipline are not unimportant, not the least of which because we reason through speech and language. Words are not translations of our thoughts, they are our thoughts.
Consequently, clean communication is training for clean thinking (and also - yes, I'd argue that does mean that different languages might argue different ways). Cicero (De Orat. 1.32.144) makes the point - in his advice for orators, he gives speaking correctly *first*...
...before invention (that is, topic selection and choice of evidence), before structure, before rhetorical flourish. "First, speak correctly, then grammatically, then clearly, then simply." If grammarly is a tool to get there, great. But it is not a tool *around* getting there.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
