Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I'm struck by how advertisements for services like grammerly put the lie to the idea that there no economic value to the humanities. grammerly is a program that ties to replicate (poorly) the sort of prose stylistics that are precisely the sort of thing the humanities teach. 1/5
And people are apparently paying for it! It's almost like decades of de-emphasizing the humanities has produced folks with crucial skill-gaps in the 'soft' skills that are nevertheless essential in a world that remains dominated by *people* and not computers. 2/5
Now a caveat - I suspect some might say, "What about ESL/ESP, folks with non-standard education or abilities, etc - couldn't these programs be for them?" Sure! More language-learning resources are always great. But I would note that is *not* who they are being marketed to.. 3/5
...the grammerly ads I see are clearly targeted at culturally fluent white workers in white-collar jobs involving management and communication. Precisely the sort of person who might have been expected to have developed some skill in prose style during their education! 4/5
Moreover, while I am no expert in ESL education, I read/grade a fair number of papers every year from non-native English speakers, and they tend to have quite different struggles from native-speakers with bad prose style. Grammerly promises to fix the latter, not the former. 5/5
I disagree strenuously. I see Grammarly as a form of remedial education for those who went through permissive humanities programs that stressed self-expression at the expense of formal "excellence."
It should be seen as a partner to humanities – it provides real time correction on the rote aspects of the discipline, freeing teacher up to focus on the higher ideas/purposes of their fields.
Oh, absolutely agree. Part of that are corners of disciplines that have come to prefer obscurantism (which I abhor; as a historian if you cannot explain your topic to a lay person in everyday words, you yourself do not understand it well enough)...
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
