Matt Yglesias is emblematic of a certain wonkish strain of analysis that almost consciously refuses to recognize the existence of political tendencies with fundamental differences. For him it's all about Democratic-affiliated candidates and their *stated* positions on policy.
And I think saying Biden is the 'antithesis' of Bernie is a bit too grand. A statement can only have one antithesis and Biden ain't it. Bland liberalism is not the antithesis of leftism, they are heresies of each other - sharing *almost* all the same beliefs.
-
-
The sense in which Biden and Bernie share "almost all the same beliefs" is not a useful one. On the value of capitalism, on the nature and proper role of US power, on the underlying causes of current social outcomes, they differ radically.
-
That their current policy proposals occupy the same quadrant, generously, of the US Overton Window is, I think, a deeply mistaken reason to sort them together, and I think it's the same mistake Yglesias makes.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.