Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I mean, there's also a criticism to be made of some of the 'reformer's and the speed to which they moved to extra-legal and even violent means. But that was going to happen *eventually* regardless - if you stonewall these guys forever, someone's gonna get violent.
And while I sympathize with some of the aristocrats (particularly the post-Sullan ones trying to hold a broken system together), it's impossible to argue that 'compromise nothing' could have ever worked-because the Social War is such an obvious failure of Roman political will
Man, am I glad we got to TA that class together. I learned so much that semester.
If Ti. Gracchus never shoves a tribune, if C. Gracchus avoids public life, if Marius never becomes a soldier, if Saturninus and Sulpicius remained private citizens... Elite Roman intransigence *still* would have sparked a nearly catastrophic civil war w/ the socii.
Right - and it feels unlikely in any case that Marius was the only possible agent who would have paved the way for a series of brutal strongmen, given the very real military inadequacies he was responding to.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
