Just to reiterate: there is no such thing as limited nuclear warfare. And anyone who says otherwise is willfully ignorant of nuclear weapons (hint: even a “low yield” one isn’t small) and is kidding themselves about how other countries would respond to an attack.https://twitter.com/MichaelJDoidge/status/1232377715908583424 …
-
Yeah. Totally weird and unexpected that the other side gets a say in things. Also that itsy bitsy problem of chance/friction/fortuna/luck/fate (whatever your theorist of choice calls it)
Right! That limited Roman War in Sicily in 264, man, that sure stayed nice and contained and totally didn't turn into two massive multi-decade conflicts. This is such a Strategy-101 lesson and yet, like the Gods of the Copybook headings, we limp up to explain it once more!
-
-
Or that tiny balls up in the Balkans in 1914.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.