...wait what is it
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @em_aytch
It seems to be maybe a computer terminal where you...do...stocks?
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @PetreRaleigh ja @em_aytch
Basically correct, although the terminal is the software rather than the machine. The value in it is the real-time feed of market data and electronic trading. And I've only ever seen one in person because my sister once worked for a company whose software had to run on one.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
She had one for the purpose of bug-testing. Anyway, they are fantastically expensive ($20k per year per terminal) because the value of being able to interact with the market in real time, rather than at a delay, is huge for financial firms.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
I think that's an invention which does provide actual value in the economy (more efficient markets are good). So I don't really begrudge Bloomberg his billions; it wasn't rent-seeking. But a notable invention doesn't entitle one to buy the presidency and it is a disgrace to try
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @nattersmichelle ja @BretDevereaux
I had no idea this guy's name was in such regular usage as an adjective in any context and I do not care for it!!
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @PetreRaleigh ja @nattersmichelle
Yeah, I love me some capitalism, but the 'hero billionaire' thing has gone too far. No less than Adam Smith pointed out that these men are not saints. "It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer...that we expect our dinner, but from regard to their own interest."
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
It is, after all, the beauty of capitalism that we, quite literally, don't owe Bloomberg a damn thing for whatever good he has done, because he was very literally paid for it already.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @nattersmichelle
What responsibility does he actually have for it, though? Is he actually a programmer or developer? I have no sense of the corporate history here
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
Yeah, he has an EE degree and was responsible for designing the software infrastructure for another investment firm before heading off on his own to do the bloomberg thing.
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @nattersmichelle
Huh. Go figure.
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystäKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.