I’m fascinated by powerful people who are incapable of accountability. Dawkins indefensibly advocated for eugenics. In the wake of that backlash, he is legit incapable of self-analysis. The focus immediately shifts to “Twitter nastiness” instead of WHY the backlash occurred.https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/1229366421081247744 …
-
-
No need. Totally agree. That's not what this is about. It's about people dunking on a strawman interpretation of Dawkins. Dunk all you want, but steelman his shit first.
-
I did that. He clearly says 'it would work' - historical experience suggests that, in fact, societies that attempt such things weaken themselves. It does not work! And, I'd contend, suggesting that it does work is dangerous; not everyone will share moral qualms against it.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Ah, but I don’t agree that Sparta was necessarily eugenicist (in comparison to the ancient general practice of infanticide). I believe this is Plutarch’s mythmaking inflated by laconophilia. It’s one of the major points I make in THE BRONZE LIE.
-
That's a fair position to take. It boils down to an unanswerable question about the reliability of sources that we have few ways to check. Myself, I tend to see Plut.'s narrative as broadly consistent with the priorities in Xen., on the assumption the latter is white-washing.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.