Since it is very likely that the US Senate will be taking a particular and important oath in the coming weeks, I thought I would resurface my post on the topic here: https://acoup.blog/2019/06/28/collections-oaths-how-do-they-work/ … and then do a little thread on the implications of oath-taking in this context. 1/11
-
-
...the idea is important enough that it is one of the Ten Commandments (forswearing an oath is a core part of 'taking the name Lord's name in vain'). Theologically, a forsworn oath is a form of blasphemy. Note also on the seriousness of oaths Matt. 5:33-37. 7/11
Näytä tämä ketju -
So for the 86 Christians and 8 Jews in the US Senate, the formality of that impeachment oath carries very real religious import - presumably if you believe in that particular God, you also believe he meant business when he said not to forswear oaths. 8/11
Näytä tämä ketju -
(I can't speak for the five senators listed as unaffiliated, or for the Buddhist conceptions of oaths, about which I am insufficiently informed - sorry
@maziehirono ). 9/11Näytä tämä ketju -
Summing up: quite apart from the issue of legal perjury, any religious US Senator ought to be quite concerned that forswearing the impeachment oath carries quite severe - probably eternal - divine judgment. They are *literally* calling on God to damn them if they...10/11
Näytä tämä ketju -
...break their oath. One would think that the prospect of eternal damnation would be stronger than partisanship. Or...we may be about to find out that a number of Senators believe in their party more than in God. Again, oath post is here: https://acoup.blog/2019/06/28/collections-oaths-how-do-they-work/ … end/11
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.