Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
So, I have to say, I don't have a lot of confidence that a significant swath of the public is going to be able to separate 1) was Soleimani the kind of person who ought to be blown up and 2) was it strategically wise do blow him up.
For what its worth, the answer to (1) is 'absolutely' but the answer to (2) likely appears to be 'no.' Soleimani was already at war with the USA; there are a lot of folks out there for whom you could make the same case. It would be strategically unwise to blow up most of them.
The thing I haven't been able to confirm-and I am no regional expert-was strike done around or over the objections of the Iraqi gov't, or were they clued in? Big difference in the strategic, but hard to assess; public statements may not be accurate, many reasons to misrepresent.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
