Why? I think it is because the old Cold War American alliance system - of which NATO is a crucial component - leaves an insufficient pool of real power to balance *against* the United States. China and Russia struggle to find friends, because all the good friends are taken. 7/20
The best description of the Roman alliance system I've seen in print is Tim Cornell calling it "a criminal operation which compensates its victims by enrolling them in the gang and inviting them to share in the proceeds of future robberies." 1/
-
-
There's truth to that characterization, which I think is illustrative here: Rome's allies, in many cases, stayed allies (while they did) because it was in their interest. The Italian allies of Rome (the socii) got their share of the loot, got to march in the victory parade...2/
-
...and even seem to have had access to settlement in colonies founded on seized land. Obviously, the USA is not going to pillage non-NATO countries to provide goodies to handout to wavering NATO members, that's not what I'm suggesting 3/
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.