ok, a standard presentation; for a different one: https://hrcak.srce.hr/200310 Have also in mind that there are several moral arguments that you don't mention, for instance one by Pericles in his speech (doulosis and dikaiosis....); also 3.82 should as well be taken into account.
Of course. This was an essay focusing on a single short passage, aimed at readers who may not have encountered Thucydides before (which is most of them). But, as I note towards the end, Thucydides is more complex than any one short passage, because of course he is.
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
The interpretations are not settled, trust me. The fact, that Hobbes translated Th. and borrowed from him without acknowledgment in the Leviathan, heavily influenced later interpretations including one Bret presented.
- Näytä vastaukset
-
-
-
i fully understand; also, i think that you could have given a few basic details on the Corynth/Corcyra conflict and the Thirty Year Peace. Also, Th. never finished the book. Sparta won the war, but there is a slight bias in Th. in favour of Athens. Lastly, his Greek is tricky
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.