Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
But the Romans were still militarily strong thanks to tough semi civilized recruits like the Illyrians while the Han strategy was basically use the barbarians to fight the barbarians. I think the general trope(for pre-moderns) holds up well.
You'll have to forgive me for being a touch brusque, but no. The armies with which the Romans conquered Sicily, North Africa, Spain, Greece, Gaul, Illyria, Anatolia, Syria, Egypt, inter alia, were made of two groups of Italian peasants: with Roman citizenship and without.
The army of the imperial period was half Roman citizens and half auxiliaries, but many of those auxiliaries were recruited from the posh, civilized parts of the empire. Archers from Crete is the standard example.
As for the Han Chinese, while yes, they recruited auxiliaries from everywhere, the core of the army, as I understand it, remained the ethnically Han professional infantry, which was still the core of the army when the dynasty collapsed.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
