Crenshaw is also asserting a distinction between "public" and "private" moral ordering that is largely meaningless in a New Testament context.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
I think this example operates at cross purposes to the rest, as it suggests that *some* authorities are *not* to be honored - and surely we can't assert that some kind of "secular v. religious" dichotomy explains the gulf between the different cases. Another anachronism, no?
A situation where a Christian might be obligated to give to charity, but not be obligated - or be positively forbidden - from requiring that others do so through state power.