Crenshaw is also asserting a distinction between "public" and "private" moral ordering that is largely meaningless in a New Testament context.
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
I think this example operates at cross purposes to the rest, as it suggests that *some* authorities are *not* to be honored - and surely we can't assert that some kind of "secular v. religious" dichotomy explains the gulf between the different cases. Another anachronism, no?
I'm not convinced we have to dismiss it as anachronism. Take John 18:36, contrasting secular and spiritual power. On the same theme, James 4:4, Romans 12:2, or 1 John 15-17.