Just saw she will testify if “The terms are fair” Here’s a concept.... They ask questions, you answer said questions!!! Fair enough?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
DiFi sat on this for months...this is strictly a delay tactic. Time to vote and confirm.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
VOTE!! Do not let this ridiculous Democrat stall ploy delay the VOTE past next week. It’s an intentional smear on a man of great integrity. BULLSHIT!!
#CONFIRMKAVANAUGHThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I sure miss Charles Krauthammer’s commentary during times like these.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Important caveat: She wants an *impartial* investigation, conducted by qualified investigators. There’s precedent for involving the FBI, and there’s time for them to do their work. The deadline is arbitrary.
-
The FBI got involved due to the working relationship between Thomas and Hill, in federal jobs where she was his subordinate. Plus, the investigation took place prior to the accusation being made public when there were few facts to present to the Judiciary Committee.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
NJ senator Cory Booker admits in 1992 article that he was involved in 1984 high school groping incident
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
MS. Ford must know that investigators will do a complete profile of her as well as the alleged perpetrator that is how investigators work and it is very probable that her profile will be very revealing as to motive! Behind the alleged offense .
-
They would have had plenty to look at had she not scrubbed her social media!! That tells me all I need to know. What did she have to hide??
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How many times can it be said? A witness claiming to possess evidence relevant to confirmation vote has been afforded to provide evidence in several ways. Witnesses don’t get to dictate that the FBI investigate 36 year old allegations as pre-condition of testifying. Full stop.
-
Wouldn’t she be the first person the FBI would interrogate in an investigation?
-
Can she refuse?
-
Yes, she hasn’t been subpoenaed. Her accusation is relevant to his fitness as a Supreme Court justice. She has been provided an opportunity to testify. If she declines, they vote without her evidence. It’s that simple. This process has become a cartoon.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it’s all totally unnecessary. It’s a BS claim and the only reason the Senate is tap dancing is because it’s the allegation “du jour”!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The pervasive lack of understanding of who does what and when in our governmental system is a testament to tragic failure of public education.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wouldnt hire a cleaner in my house, or a school teacher, with this hanging out there. “Oh well... we tried... welcome aboard.”
-
Would you fire someone you knew for years if someone came up and said they were groped by that person 35 years ago and gave no other information and didn’t back up the claim when you asked for more details?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.