If you had said that during Nixon administration you would have clearly been wrong. Relate of blind faith...
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To bad the NYT wasn't this righteous and expose all the inner activities of Obama and the Clinton state department.
-
Uh huh. If only they were as corrupt and incompetent as Trump’s.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Approved by Nike!!! Elected by the citizens of the United States of America!!!!pic.twitter.com/QQpo6dAGs3
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here’s a legitimate news question. Will
@BretBaier and@FoxNews actually stop glossing over the facts and start reporting on the actual national disgrace that the@realDonaldTrump administration is? -
Umm..let guess...NOT a fan of President Trump???
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Pardon me for not believing the NY Times that the author of the op-ed was/is in a position with personal knowledge of what the person was writing about! The author could have been Omarosa for all we know. The NY Times doesn't determine credibility of an author for Americans!
-
Could have been Woodward. The timing is suspect...
-
If Woodward penned the anonymous NY Times op-ed, he couldn't be a "senior official" in the White House. But your point to suspect that major papers such as the NY Times or the WaPost could have one of their reporters/writers to pen an anonymous article is certainly possible!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BretBaier, Should legitimate media outlets have a standing policy not to publicize or publish anonymous reports or editorials? -
My thoughts exactly.
-
@DavidAsmanfox on FBN said when he was an Editor THWSJ they had a policy that at least 70% of an anonymous tip had to be proven factual before going to print. Seems like the NYT has decided to become a Supermarket Tabloid. Next report: Trump not from Earth!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It was kellyanne in the rose garden with the dagger
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Here’s the issue no one will address head-on: In his role and responsibilities as
#POTUS,@realDonaldTrump is doing the job he was elected to perform. Sure, he Tweets like a whiner and boasts and grandstands, he’s not leading a failed administration. Why the efforts to sabotage? -
Because they can't accept that Hillary lost.
-
That would explain the Democrats' snits and grandstanding, but the op-ed and the reporting by
@realBobWoodward point to a really scary reality: The Executive Branch and its role in government is being attacked and subverted simply because of who was elected. -
Right. Just look at the last 3 days of hearings. Their problem isn't with the nominee, but with the person who nominated him.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.