The Ds as you call them -- liberal Dems are using what they don't have to obstruct. They have 480,000 docs which is more than enough. How many Dems have read all the 480,000 -- my guess N O N E! Get on with it and confirm this highly qualified nominee! Stand up USA to liberals.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1/This isn't about trying to evaluate Kavanaugh's qualifications. It is a quixotic attempt on the part of rabidly partisan Democrats to block a well qualified nominee. Reid made the Democrats' bed when he changed Senate rules, so now Schumer will wear the hair shirt.
-
2/ It is much ado about nothing. Kabuki theater to stoke the progressive fires in advance of the November elections..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
a lawyer's papers concerning a client/president should not be public.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Many Democrats have already stated their intention to vote against the nominee, but still argue for more documents.
#HypocritesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Honestly! Your guess Bret of the % of Docs provided DEMs have read so far? Be honest! (You know DEMs have read < 5% combined. They don't care.)
#BigShow#ThreeRingCircus#PoorProduction#NoAwardsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We are asking for a stately process with open, honest discussion of all the information available, or concrete reasons why that information cannot be made available. That is what deliberative bodies are supposed to do. Late night document dumps do not fall under that rubric.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@greta hearing from him should be enough there are plenty of documents to read. Some are between client & lawyerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rs have never subjected Ds liberal nominees to such an anal exam. Ds announcement of blocking at all costs ahead of time, reveals pure partisan motivation.
-
1) Republicans simply Refused to even meet With Obama’s nominee. Stated it was to close to an Election We are 60 days away from Elections that likely could result in Dems taking both the House & Senate. The Same should apply now.
-
Apples and Oranges. Presidential election vs midterm -- Midterm doesnt change who nominates.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There us so much out there already. If anyone cant figure out his thought process is not reading. He has given more docs than any other. Their slimmer records were sufficient enough.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you can't see that asking for more documents is just a dem ploy to delay the hearing, then I suspect much of what happens in this hearing will go unnoticed or misunderstood by the same people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
honestly I think the two of you brett bear some responsibility for how how norms have become angry and piggish
@StephenAtHome
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Presidential Records Act and Executive Privilege should remain inviolate!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Man!! Democracy is messy, isn't it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.