seems the car one is inaccurate in that the cars aren't sufficiently separated.. this shows cars travelling very slow, like 10km/h?
Whether we have the space to move more & more people as cities grow, plus room for all the OTHER important things that make streets & cities great, depends ENTIRELY on HOW we choose to move. And how design makes better choices easier or harder. HT @NACTOpic.twitter.com/hOaafrbrKu
-
-
-
I mean, in most downtown areas, realistically the road lanes arent any bigger than shown here. No one compares a freeway to a sidewalk.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
How can I use this gif for community presentations about transportation?
-
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Like the animated via, but important to note that those numbers seem to lack scientific rigor as
@AleTirachini noted weeks agohttps://twitter.com/AleTirachini/status/1178654669473746945 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Interesting that vehicles in transit lane move faster that ones in car lane, although distance between them is pretty same. Is there a reason for that ?
-
Over-simplified graphics, but the dots look about the right densities. Figures are broadly correct (if anything the transit one could go a lot higher - some commuter rail systems get up towards 100k/direction/hour)
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Cool Graphic; I suspect the imagery betrays number accuracy; ...I've never seen cars drive that slow ...North America doesn't install
#AllAgesAbility bike lanes wide enough for side by side cycling & safe passing#bicycle#VisionZero#BikeLife#way2narrowhttps://twitter.com/BrentToderian/status/1194524987865960448?s=20 …
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.