Simple, better headlinehttps://twitter.com/ntdPhD/status/1431621972799197194?s=20 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
This quote from a TX state rep really gives the game away https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/27/us/politics/texas-voting-rights-bill.html …pic.twitter.com/8oFuoEi8Vt
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
One day, if the Constitution hasn't been put in the shredder for good, a scholar will examine the trajectory of
@nytimes editorial policy and find a steady underlying drumbeat of support for an imperial presidency unmoored from the constraints of consent of all the governed. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ahh but this is the approach they have decided brings in the most clicks and $$$$. Journalism be damned.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At first glance, I actually thought this was from that NYT pitch generator bot thing... Yikes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Continues to be wild that on Afghanistan every reporter is a policy expert who cares about substance but on covid deaths, democracy, it’s just impossible to evaluate any outcomes at all let alone say deaths and authoritarianism are bad
-
that’s because they aren’t worried about losing subscribers in afghanistan
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
They wouldn't even have to call it a voter suppression effort, or racist, to provide more accurate context. They could avoid any accusations of editorializing simply by noting that every rationale behind the bill is factually debunked bullshit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Save yourself some keystrokes and make "Precisely the wrong approach by the NY Times" a macro.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.