Bree NewsomeVerified account

@BreeNewsome

artist - free black woman - we are more than conquerors through Christ who loves us

North Carolina, USA
Joined February 2010

Tweets

You blocked @BreeNewsome

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @BreeNewsome

  1. Aug 22

    "Law and order" is reserved for the poor, black, brown and undocumented.

    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    Aug 22
    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    Aug 21

    So to recap: 1) Yes the hell a sitting president can be indicted if he breaks the law. He’s not a king. That’s simply not been the practice b/c 2) Congress is supposed to be holding impeachment hearings in a situation like this but 3) they refuse to do so b/c reasons listed above

    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    Aug 21

    They also r not opposed to 45’s racist agenda. That’s y Sessions is willing to endure constant humiliation from 45 if it means he can persecute immigrants. That’s y Congress is willing 2 throw democratic norms & rule of law out window if they can get ultra-conservative judge 7/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. Retweeted
    Aug 21

    Nixon resigned & Clinton was impeached w/o it being threat to white power structure or ideology of white supremacy. By contrast, 45 is most prominent icon of modern white supremacist mvmt & folks in Congress (esp. GOP) are terrified of igniting his base of white voters 6/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    Aug 21

    To impeach this president would be to delegitimize the racist, misogynist movement he represents and to acknowledge that his political ascendancy is a product of illegal activity more so than the will of the masses. 5/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    Aug 21

    Again, if this were any prior prez, impeachment proceedings wld already be underway. We're at this juncture b/c 45 is new icon for white racial grievance. He rose to power pushing conspiracy theories that 1st black president was illegitimate, but 45 has never been legitimate 4/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    Aug 21

    And if that’s the case, then we don’t have a presidency but have returned to having a king. The king is the law and therefore by definition can not be in violation of the law. 3/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Aug 21

    But to say a president who’s committed crime can’t be indicted under any circumstance— including a circumstance where the president’s party in Congress refuses to impeach him and in many ways aids his attempts to obstruct justice— is to say that the president is above the law. 2/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    Aug 21

    The historical practice of not indicting a sitting president is based on the assumption there's a functioning Congress willing to act in its role of applying checks and balances to executive power 1/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. Aug 21

    So to recap: 1) Yes the hell a sitting president can be indicted if he breaks the law. He’s not a king. That’s simply not been the practice b/c 2) Congress is supposed to be holding impeachment hearings in a situation like this but 3) they refuse to do so b/c reasons listed above

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Aug 21

    They also r not opposed to 45’s racist agenda. That’s y Sessions is willing to endure constant humiliation from 45 if it means he can persecute immigrants. That’s y Congress is willing 2 throw democratic norms & rule of law out window if they can get ultra-conservative judge 7/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  13. Aug 21

    Nixon resigned & Clinton was impeached w/o it being threat to white power structure or ideology of white supremacy. By contrast, 45 is most prominent icon of modern white supremacist mvmt & folks in Congress (esp. GOP) are terrified of igniting his base of white voters 6/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  14. Aug 21

    To impeach this president would be to delegitimize the racist, misogynist movement he represents and to acknowledge that his political ascendancy is a product of illegal activity more so than the will of the masses. 5/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Aug 21

    Again, if this were any prior prez, impeachment proceedings wld already be underway. We're at this juncture b/c 45 is new icon for white racial grievance. He rose to power pushing conspiracy theories that 1st black president was illegitimate, but 45 has never been legitimate 4/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  16. Aug 21

    And if that’s the case, then we don’t have a presidency but have returned to having a king. The king is the law and therefore by definition can not be in violation of the law. 3/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  17. Aug 21

    But to say a president who’s committed crime can’t be indicted under any circumstance— including a circumstance where the president’s party in Congress refuses to impeach him and in many ways aids his attempts to obstruct justice— is to say that the president is above the law. 2/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. Aug 21

    The historical practice of not indicting a sitting president is based on the assumption there's a functioning Congress willing to act in its role of applying checks and balances to executive power 1/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    Aug 21

    2.3M incarcerated people in the U.S., the largest imprisoned population in the world. Today prisoners begin a nationwide Read their demands: Image via

    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    Aug 20

    Majority-black county in Georgia planning to close 7 of 9 polling places when running to become first black female governor. & now threatening to sue

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·