That’s a perfect way to frame your thread. I fully support avoiding the pitchfork mentality and knee jerk reactions. We, as voters, should keep our humanity while working to find solutions that doesn’t have this happen to others.
-
-
Replying to @GehaniNeil @michelletandler
C'mon Neil- you're going to call this a "knee jerk" reaction? This goes on EVERYDAY and has been since
@chesaboudin has been the DA. And two people are dead - f'n dead- let that sink in buddy. Do we really need more facts about what happened here? It was a matter of time.1 reply 0 retweets 22 likes -
We can disagree on that - I get the reactions - they are born out of anger. What’s ur solution? It’s easy to get mad. We should be sympathetic, we should also think practically about how to solve them. I was talking about what
@michelletandler called the “pitchfork” reaction.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GehaniNeil @BravoSFPols and
The easiest part of whatever solution exists is to remove Chesa.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @arjunxkapoor @BravoSFPols and
We know the facts, I don't dispute them. The solutions like recall etc don't have a case and no one yet has offered a solution that's practical to get majority of voters support. For example, no one seems to be asking why the parole board who has the right to hold, didn't?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
2) Your 2nd. resp. is exactly the resp. of how/why leaders are not held accountable- it's frankly sad. Of course people are asking why parole bd. didn't hold. BUT Chesa is the first line of defense- he was arrested in SF. Good leaders take action and don't wait for others.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BravoSFPols @GehaniNeil and
Further, you're ignoring the BIG WHITE ELEPHANT in the room. CHESA IS A BROKEN MAN who is managing the entire city of SF based on his own personal deranged, and dangerous views of criminal justice. It seems like it's obvious to everyone but you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
AFAIK that’s the law currently. The parole board is responsible for holding parolees if they violate. He already said that he is looking into why it didn’t work here and what changes are required so I’ll wait to see the results of that before I jump to conclusions re: remedies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Neil, the parole board can choose to do what they want, they don't have to hold. But you're missing the major point - it's a NEW crime- arrest, prosecute, and sentence coordinate with parole board immediately to make sure he remains in jail. Common sense.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
A new crime by a parole means that the responsibility and authority was given to them to hold them without further involvement from the DA AFAIK. I’d like to understand why that didn’t happen. I want to know the details before rendering judgement.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Neil, why do you refuse to ask the question of why @chesaboudin didn't hold and prosecute the new offenses? Btw, I believe the parole board already responded and it was not pretty. Let me find.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.