Here's the deal: If UFOs wanted us to know what they are and why they are here, we'd know. BUT WE DON'T. Which is why we all debate it, ALL THE TIME. We have hypotheses. We DO NOT have knowledge in this arena. WE DO NOT. STOP IT!
-
-
Antwort an @PostDisclosure
The evidence suggests that there are a diversity of origins, agendas & types - using advanced physics & technology. Is it multidimensional, extraterrestrial or ultra-terrestrial? Yes. Are they all playing by the same/similar rules, or common rules of engagement? No.
26 Antworten 27 Retweets 204 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @PostDisclosure
Where might this evidence be? Are we speaking on new evidence or files we have yet to see by a special someone?
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 4 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @Timspeer8 @PostDisclosure
We are gathering compelling evidence & data... Also - Jacques Vallee’s “Wonders in the Sky” presents ample evidence that from biblical times to present, there have been sightings, interactions & very real experiences with these mysterious entities. We are NOT alone.
8 Antworten 7 Retweets 69 Gefällt mir -
I respect and appreciate your opinion on this topic, Brandon. Regarding the evidence your statements are based on, what % of those statements are based on info available to the public, vs info you're privy to that the public is not?
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir -
90/10
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
Thank you. What do you think the odds are of that 10% becoming available to the public within the next couple years? (and to be clear, I'm not suggesting you're the one in control of that information)
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir
50/50 ;)
-
-
I should have seen that answer coming:)
0 Antworten 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mirDanke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.