3/3: across the board. This isn’t anything negative about the SKINWALKER ranch show in particular - in fact, I think they could be a lot more sensational if they wanted to be, but about how editingis done in these for maximum impact. Science is science and TV is entertainment.
-
-
Antwort an @Rizstanford @BrandonFugal und
I agree with all of this but I can't see how a proper scientific investigative documentary would ever get made. Sadly most people prefer thi of sensationalist 'live' action type of production. It's only those with a deep interest in the subject that would prefer a diff approach.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 4 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TheChilterns @BrandonFugal und
True. I think we should view tv shows as pointing out phenomenon “for further investigation” -
@BrandonFugal’s idea of setting up a website with scientific data and evidence is a good one, and having even more footage than what they edit into an episode could be worthwhile too.1 Antwort 1 Retweet 7 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @Rizstanford @BrandonFugal und
Yes, good idea but it still doesn't mean that the program itself can't be produced with more scientific vigour. The producers/directors got it badly wrong and BF should insist editorial control should be given to him or someone with proper scientific documentary kudos.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TheChilterns @BrandonFugal und
Unfortunatley it’s the entertainment industry ...to do it “right “ you have to independently finance and not count on any tv networks or advertisers...but then the investors would likely lose money as it’s not exciting enough! So better to just get it out to a big audience on tv!
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @Rizstanford @BrandonFugal und
It requires someone to take a risk, buck the trend & produce something of suitable gravitas. I think people would actually respond positively to something more scientific & serious. The viewers' intelligence is being insulted. What's certain, is that they got this one badly wrong
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TheChilterns @Rizstanford und
I feel I took a big risk to go public, allow access to the ranch & to subject our team (me included) to this kind of scrutiny. I’m not aware of another tv effort of this magnitude focused on exploring these topics - unscripted, real people, real scientists & a very real place.
16 Antworten 8 Retweets 62 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @TheChilterns und
Good show for sure .ime quessing u have stuff u havnt showed the world yet .abit juicier so to speak
.
.and did u start out this venture blindly so to speak .or did u actually sit down with Bigelow and have a conversation about this ? Thx1 Antwort 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @Stephen24563580 @TheChilterns und
I spent a day with Robert Bigelow and then had several follow up discussions...he was a total gentleman and professional, but sold the property absolutely as-is with no files or documentation provided other than the typical survey @ title materials. We started completely new.
2 Antworten 3 Retweets 13 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @TheChilterns und
Shame that .but his choice I suppose. And possibly could of saved u time and money.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 4 Gefällt mir
It’s ok - that was the deal, and I respect Bigelow and his courage to go on record regarding the reality of the phenomenon.
-
-
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @TheChilterns und
For sure takes a strong person to say what he did especially in his position. A good attitude to not care what others think is key.
0 Antworten 0 Retweets 4 Gefällt mirDanke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.