Dr. Taylor is NOT a career TV scientist. He’s worked on various programs for the United States Department of Defense & NASA for 16+ yrs - continues to work for both. He has PhDs in Optical Science & Engineering & Aerospace Systems Engineering, & 3 Masters (Physics/Astronomy/Eng)
-
-
Yes, he's got impressive credentials and experience. But a non-trivial chunk of his career now is doing these TV shows. He's certainly not JUST a TV Scientist, but it's on his resume. You could just hire an RF measuring expert, but that would be really boring.pic.twitter.com/zJzhOOD97L
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
-
Antwort an @murnut @BrandonFugal und
I'm being realistic. Brandon knows there's trade-offs for doing a show like this. The producers need to give an entertaining narrative, with appropriate reactions, etc. Taylor, while no doubt being an actual scientist/engineer, is also great at working with producers.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
I strongly disagree w/the way you marginalize/diminish his credibility as both a scientist & objective observer/experiencer. You’d be hard pressed to find someone who is equally credentialed among the cacophony of critics. Plus he’s joined by 2 other legit scientists on my team.
3 Antworten 1 Retweet 20 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @murnut und
Well the problem here is that his credibility, knowledge, and experience isn't really coming though in the show. You see hints of it, like when he express skepticism when that giant magnet was rolled out. But it's mostly hidden by the show's production.
3 Antworten 0 Retweets 4 Gefällt mir -
True - that is a legitimate criticism. The television medium has its challenges, but it also a powerful medium to inform the general public & stimulate interest and discussion.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 15 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @MickWest und
The TV medium may have that potential, but what actually happens, more often than not, is uncritical acceptance of subjective beliefs. From my seat, that’s much more of a cultural hindrance than positive contribution.
4 Antworten 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TheUFOTrail @MickWest und
That’s a fair criticism. I can see your point of view. Give me some examples of truly positive contributions over the last 30 years that have truly advanced and elevated the discussion & research regarding these topics.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 6 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @MickWest und
IMO, such efforts typically don’t appeal to UFO enthusiasts because legit contributions must come at the topic without paranormal preconceived assumptions, but research into Hessdalen & Brown Mtn Lights come to mind. My 2 cents.
3 Antworten 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir
Interesting. I respect the great research conducted by Erling Strand & team at Hessdalen regarding luminous phenomena...going on officially since 1983. Are you saying that there haven’t been paranormal preconceived assumptions? Have you communicated with Strand?
-
-
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @MickWest und
Just an off the cuff remark. I interpret a lot of the Hessdalen & Brown Mtn research leans towards geological or weather phenomena. I think a lot of relevant material is overlooked by UFO World because it doesn’t support its beliefs (IFOs, critical thinking skills, etc.).
3 Antworten 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir -
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.