Well, what other ‘proof’ is there then? We can only go by what is presented about SR by these folks - and it isn’t a lot.
-
-
This is why it’s not grounds to call it an embarrassment. It’s common sense that a TV show is not presenting everything going on there nor the full spectrum of analyzation. Going on limited information to make a sweeping statement is not fact based. It’s just not.
4 Antworten 0 Retweets 6 Gefällt mir -
Well, a tv show isn’t science, is it? So claiming it’s scientific is ridiculous.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir -
Post Disclosure World hat Brandon Fugal retweetet
The owner tweeted this: https://twitter.com/BrandonFugal/status/1253535264275750912?s=20 … Jack responded by saying the ranch is an embarrassment. Within the context of the conversation it appears to me he is asserting that what's going on at the ranch isn't scientific. NOT just TV show.
Post Disclosure World hat hinzugefügt,
Brandon Fugal @BrandonFugalAntwort an @TheUFOTrailscientific method a method of research in which a problem is identified, relevant data are gathered, a hypothesis is formulated from these data, & the hypothesis is empirically tested. This is what my team has been engaged in for the past several years. No false claims.3 Antworten 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
As bears continuous repeating, if access is granted to the evidence, facts can be quickly established. We can debate hearsay forever. Legit researchers do not do ‘science by press release’. Stop calling it science to try to earn legitimacy.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir -
There are scientists there conducting experiments. You haven't visited the ranch. You haven't talked w/ Erik Bard, Jim Segala, or Travis Taylor. You're calling it an embarrassment with knowing so little. Seems to me you don't follow your own advice.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 5 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @PostDisclosure @TheUFOTrail und
I'm enjoying the show. It's their show. The sharing of data, which is valuable, is not required for ratings and might work against that. TV shows about scientific studies are not science.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @murnut @TheUFOTrail und
This is a straw man to what initiated the conversation I was in. What started it, as tweets show, is Jack saying the *ranch* is an embarrassment and NOT scientific study. The context does not suggest he was exclusively talking about the TV show.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @PostDisclosure @murnut und
The entire “Skinwalker Ranch” saga, from Knapp to History, owner to owner, stem to stern, is an unsubstantiated tale of hearsay. If scientific documentation of extraordinary events exists, it has never been published. Again, we can argue hearsay forever. Facts prevail in the end.
3 Antworten 0 Retweets 4 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TheUFOTrail @PostDisclosure und
You do realize the point of
@BrandonFugal ‘s efforts is to provide scientific documentation of extraordinary events correct? AFAIK they’re not building a theme park there anytime soon.2 Antworten 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir
There have never been any plans for any such use, and never will be under my stewardship. We are focused on preserving the integrity of the investigation and research.
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.