Brandon Fugal

Can you point to the place that makes you so confident they won’t submit findings for review?

You really need to ask that question to Fugal.

Fugal isn’t here bashing the whole process.

Irrelevant: claimant should provide evidence supporting extraordinary claims.

This isn’t a court of law and you aren’t a judge. How about this: if you’re so incensed about what they’re doing just don’t watch the show.

Temper temper. I am not incensed and I don’t watch the show. If there’s something there I’ll probably see it in the ads for a third season on History Channel, cause, isn’t this the state of American scientific anomaly research these days.

Why are you even commenting if you don’t watch the show? The question is not meant to be adversarial, I am just curious. It’s like me arguing with someone about a book I have never read.

It's so sad to hear criticisms of the research done there. I would like to see what they could do better and see what kind of budget they could get. They would spend their days trying to send radio signals into space and call it science.