Don’t think so. If it was light pillar snow flake lens effect then the lights on the left would have shown the same. I would know I live in Alberta Canada and only see them below -20 Celsius.
-
-
Antwort an @steven_dor @IBKing46 und
Those seem to be much dimmer lights, and not in the same general location. Here's an example of a single bright light showing up as a pillar, but nearby lights not at all. https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/social-media-lighting-up-over-mysterious-pillar-of-light-in-edmonton-1.4704052 …pic.twitter.com/Qf85bMyqqx
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
Most of the light pillars I seen look like thispic.twitter.com/CkZmxuC7Xn
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 0 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @steven_dor @IBKING46 und
Yeah, well you don't live in rural Utah :) You've got a bunch of nearby lights of similar sizes and distances. The UTAH case looks like just one really bright light. I'd suspect a farmer or something at an oil well. Single bright light. Single pillar.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @MickWest @steven_dor und
The challenge is that there is not an oil well or potential source on top of the Mesa that aligns with that pillars, from what I have been told. Also, the light pillars that appear to be originating from the top of the mesa have only been seen & recorded in the infrared.
3 Antworten 1 Retweet 16 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @steven_dor und
It really looks like it's behind the mesa. Do you happen to know *exactly* where the camera was here? I can do a line of sight check, but the camera position is not clear.pic.twitter.com/k8pNpPfJVp
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 4 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @MickWest @steven_dor und
Good question! That’s an Erik Bard question...i know he closely monitors the dozens of cameras and is very particular about their positioning. i am going to thoroughly review with him...
2 Antworten 1 Retweet 11 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @MickWest und
We have learnt over the past two years that Mick will go to the extreme to explain away anything unusual, ensuring it has a ‘rational’ explanation every time, even when there might no be an rational explanation.
@PostDisclosure1 Antwort 0 Retweets 4 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @AFSUnidentified @MickWest und
I would love to confirm a natural, prosaic explanation for what we are seeing...every time we are able to do that, I see it as progress. As I often say, we are trying to separate the signal from the noise, & prefer to focus on that which is most “interesting”, and has merit.
5 Antworten 1 Retweet 12 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @AFSUnidentified und
Yeah, and that's where I'm coming from - explain the explainable, debunk the debunkable, and whatever remains should be golden. We might have different expectations regarding how much will remain here once the work is done, but the process should still be the same.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 5 Gefällt mir
I agree with & appreciate this! I acquired the ranch as an open minded skeptic, actually expecting that there would be natural explanations for what had been claimed & observed, along with the potential that it was most likely an adult scientific snipe hunt of sorts. I was wrong
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.