Likely don’t need to put those on the show Mick. I don’t think he is saying there are prosaic answers for the things presented on the show.
-
-
Yeah, and that's where I'm coming from - explain the explainable, debunk the debunkable, and whatever remains should be golden. We might have different expectations regarding how much will remain here once the work is done, but the process should still be the same.
-
I agree with & appreciate this! I acquired the ranch as an open minded skeptic, actually expecting that there would be natural explanations for what had been claimed & observed, along with the potential that it was most likely an adult scientific snipe hunt of sorts. I was wrong
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Right on Brandon. Ruling out prosaic explanations is likely one of the keys. It’s refreshing to hear your the humbleness first the Phenomena. Keep up the great work!
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
West is fine, but as you can see many tend to use straw man and attack the person rather than the opinion because theirs is the only one valuable.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
As BAASS found out with their order of MUFON field investigator manuals - we were trained to rule out all prosaic explanations first. Lots of boring work actually to pull that off. Mick West is an Uber Investigator but not always right. I appreciate the methodology
-
I like Mick West. But to be honest -- I prefer a skeptic who is more open minded. Someone like Kevin Knuth. Mick comes off as being dogmatic in his view of the universe. He's just too certain that he's right, for example, about the Nimitz Event. This compromises objectivity IMO.
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.