Brandon Fugal

No, I have stated that I don’t believe in scientific rejection had there truly been something there that was a)anomalous and b)falsifiable. This is the age of CERN, after all.

Can you point to the place that makes you so confident they won’t submit findings for review?

You really need to ask that question to Fugal.

Fugal isn’t here bashing the whole process.

Irrelevant: claimant should provide evidence supporting extraordinary claims.

This isn’t a court of law and you aren’t a judge. How about this: if you’re so incensed about what they’re doing just don’t watch the show.

Temper temper. I am not incensed and I don’t watch the show. If there’s something there I’ll probably see it in the ads for a third season on History Channel, cause, isn’t this the state of American scientific anomaly research these days.

Why are you even commenting if you don’t watch the show? The question is not meant to be adversarial, I am just curious. It’s like me arguing with someone about a book I have never read.