As bears continuous repeating, if access is granted to the evidence, facts can be quickly established. We can debate hearsay forever. Legit researchers do not do ‘science by press release’. Stop calling it science to try to earn legitimacy.
-
-
There are scientists there conducting experiments. You haven't visited the ranch. You haven't talked w/ Erik Bard, Jim Segala, or Travis Taylor. You're calling it an embarrassment with knowing so little. Seems to me you don't follow your own advice.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 5 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @PostDisclosure @TheUFOTrail und
I'm enjoying the show. It's their show. The sharing of data, which is valuable, is not required for ratings and might work against that. TV shows about scientific studies are not science.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 2 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @murnut @TheUFOTrail und
This is a straw man to what initiated the conversation I was in. What started it, as tweets show, is Jack saying the *ranch* is an embarrassment and NOT scientific study. The context does not suggest he was exclusively talking about the TV show.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 3 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @PostDisclosure @murnut und
The entire “Skinwalker Ranch” saga, from Knapp to History, owner to owner, stem to stern, is an unsubstantiated tale of hearsay. If scientific documentation of extraordinary events exists, it has never been published. Again, we can argue hearsay forever. Facts prevail in the end.
3 Antworten 0 Retweets 4 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @TheUFOTrail @murnut und
You don't seem to have any facts, though. You just give your impression. So maybe it's a bit premature to say the ranch is an embarrassment with such conviction.
@BrandonFugal has said that papers are forthcoming regarding what they have discovered through their research.1 Antwort 0 Retweets 4 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @PostDisclosure @TheUFOTrail und
“Papers are forthcoming...” did he happen to mention exactly when they would be published and in which scientific peer reviewed journal?
5 Antworten 0 Retweets 1 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @memizon @PostDisclosure und
I am new to this “community”. While I appreciate respectful agreement & differing points of view, I am disappointed by the condescending & accusatory tone. I am trying my best to dedicate resources & to be communicative, transparent & sincerely interested in these topics.
14 Antworten 0 Retweets 33 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @BrandonFugal @memizon und
I meant to say “I appreciate respectful disagreement”, of course...apologies for the clunky twitter communication.
1 Antwort 0 Retweets 8 Gefällt mir -
Antwort an @BrandonFugal
I'm quite sceptic of what's in Utah, but i appreciate the way you communicate and lead the front line. You could play the deaf business man card like Bigelow, however you don't. The approach is different and i like how you engage this topic, the public and warranted criticism.
2 Antworten 0 Retweets 8 Gefällt mir
Thank you for being receptive. I have much to learn, but will work to remain communicative and transparent. These are exciting topics to explore.
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.