Brandon Fugal

I'm enjoying the show. It's their show. The sharing of data, which is valuable, is not required for ratings and might work against that. TV shows about scientific studies are not science.

This is a straw man to what initiated the conversation I was in. What started it, as tweets show, is Jack saying the *ranch* is an embarrassment and NOT scientific study. The context does not suggest he was exclusively talking about the TV show.

The entire “Skinwalker Ranch” saga, from Knapp to History, owner to owner, stem to stern, is an unsubstantiated tale of hearsay. If scientific documentation of extraordinary events exists, it has never been published. Again, we can argue hearsay forever. Facts prevail in the end.

You don't seem to have any facts, though. You just give your impression. So maybe it's a bit premature to say the ranch is an embarrassment with such conviction. @BrandonFugal has said that papers are forthcoming regarding what they have discovered through their research.

“Papers are forthcoming...” did he happen to mention exactly when they would be published and in which scientific peer reviewed journal?

I am new to this “community”. While I appreciate respectful agreement & differing points of view, I am disappointed by the condescending & accusatory tone. I am trying my best to dedicate resources & to be communicative, transparent & sincerely interested in these topics.

@BrandonFugal there's a lot of this constant negativity, and you don't even have to respond, but kudos for your rational, professional responses

Thanks for your support. I really am trying to help elevate the discussion. I am trying to leverage my experience & resources to stimulate research and dialogue that could advance discovery.