Brandon Fugal

This is why it’s not grounds to call it an embarrassment. It’s common sense that a TV show is not presenting everything going on there nor the full spectrum of analyzation. Going on limited information to make a sweeping statement is not fact based. It’s just not.

Well, a tv show isn’t science, is it? So claiming it’s scientific is ridiculous.

The owner tweeted this: https://twitter.com/BrandonFugal/status/1253535264275750912?s=20 … Jack responded by saying the ranch is an embarrassment. Within the context of the conversation it appears to me he is asserting that what's going on at the ranch isn't scientific. NOT just TV show.

As bears continuous repeating, if access is granted to the evidence, facts can be quickly established. We can debate hearsay forever. Legit researchers do not do ‘science by press release’. Stop calling it science to try to earn legitimacy.

There are scientists there conducting experiments. You haven't visited the ranch. You haven't talked w/ Erik Bard, Jim Segala, or Travis Taylor. You're calling it an embarrassment with knowing so little. Seems to me you don't follow your own advice.

I'm enjoying the show. It's their show. The sharing of data, which is valuable, is not required for ratings and might work against that. TV shows about scientific studies are not science.

This is a straw man to what initiated the conversation I was in. What started it, as tweets show, is Jack saying the *ranch* is an embarrassment and NOT scientific study. The context does not suggest he was exclusively talking about the TV show.

The entire “Skinwalker Ranch” saga, from Knapp to History, owner to owner, stem to stern, is an unsubstantiated tale of hearsay. If scientific documentation of extraordinary events exists, it has never been published. Again, we can argue hearsay forever. Facts prevail in the end.